Explainability and Bias in AI: A Security Risk?

In the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, the concepts of explainability and bias are at the forefront of discussions about security and trust. As AI systems and large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into various sectors, from healthcare to finance, ensuring these systems are both understandable and unbiased is crucial. But why are explainability and bias themselves considered security risks, and what can be done to mitigate these risks?

The Importance of Explainability in AI

Explainability refers to an AI model’s ability to understand and interpret the decisions made by its systems. For users and stakeholders to trust AI, they need to know how decisions are reached. In critical applications such as medical diagnosis or loan approvals, the inability to explain AI decisions can lead to mistrust and even harmful outcomes.

Example: Healthcare

Imagine an AI system used to diagnose diseases. If the system identifies a condition but cannot explain how it arrived at that conclusion, doctors may find it difficult to trust the diagnosis. Worse, if the AI is wrong, patients might receive inappropriate treatments, leading to severe consequences. Transparent AI models that provide insights into their decision-making process can help medical professionals make better-informed decisions, thus enhancing trust and safety.

The Challenge of Bias in AI

Bias in AI occurs when a model produces prejudiced outcomes due to flawed data or algorithms. Bias can manifest in various forms, such as racial, gender, or socioeconomic biases, and can significantly impact the fairness and equity of AI applications.

Example: Hiring Practices

Consider an AI system used for hiring employees. If the training data predominantly includes resumes from a specific demographic, the AI might learn to favor candidates from that group, perpetuating existing inequalities. Such bias not only undermines the fairness of the hiring process but also exposes companies to legal risks and reputational damage.


Explainability and Bias as Security Risks

Both explainability and bias directly impact the security and trustworthiness of AI systems. Unexplainable AI decisions can be manipulated or misinterpreted, leading to security vulnerabilities. For instance, if an AI system’s behavior cannot be understood, malicious actors might exploit this opacity to manipulate outcomes without detection.

Bias, on the other hand, can erode the foundational trust in AI systems. Biased outcomes can lead to discriminatory practices, resulting in social and ethical issues that compromise the security and integrity of AI applications.

Mitigating Risks with Explainability and Bias Management

To address these challenges, it is essential to implement robust mechanisms that enhance the explainability of AI models and actively manage and mitigate bias.

Approaches to Enhance Explainability:

Model Transparency:

Using interpretable models or providing explanations for complex models helps users understand AI decisions.

Post-Hoc Explanations:

Techniques such as LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) and SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) can be used to explain the outputs of black-box models.

Human-AI Collaboration:

Encouraging collaboration between AI systems and human experts ensures that AI decisions are validated and understood.

Strategies to Mitigate Bias:

Diverse Training Data:

Ensuring that the training data is representative of all relevant demographics helps reduce bias.

Bias Detection Tools:

Using tools to regularly check for bias in AI models can help identify and correct prejudiced outcomes.

Continuous Monitoring:

Implementing continuous monitoring systems to track AI decisions and outcomes ensures ongoing fairness and equity.


Introducing Styrk’s Trust Solution

At Styrk AI, we recognize the critical importance of explainability and bias management in AI systems. Styrk’s Trust is designed to measure, monitor, and mitigate bias in AI models and LLMs. With comprehensive and configurable scans, our solution assesses the results using industry-standard metrics, ensuring that your AI systems remain fair, transparent, and trustworthy.

By leveraging Styrk’s Solution, organizations can enhance the security, trustworthiness, and ethical standing of their AI applications, ultimately driving better outcomes and fostering greater trust among users and stakeholders.

 Managing risk proactively

Explainability and bias in AI are not just technical challenges; they are fundamental security risks that require proactive management. By adopting comprehensive solutions, organizations can address these risks head-on, ensuring that their AI systems are both fair and transparent, thereby safeguarding their integrity and trustworthiness in an increasingly AI-driven world.

Protecting Traditional AI models from Adversarial Attacks

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming our world, from facial recognition software authenticating your phone to spam filters safeguarding your inbox. But what if these powerful tools could be tricked? Adversarial attacks are a growing concern in AI security, where attackers manipulate data to cause AI systems to make critical mistakes. Gartner predicts that 30% of cyberattacks will target vulnerabilities in AI, either through manipulating training data, stealing the AI model entirely, or tricking it with deceptive inputs, highlighting the urgency of addressing these vulnerabilities.

Traditional AI models can be surprisingly susceptible to these attacks. Imagine a self-driving car mistaking a stop sign for a yield sign due to a cleverly placed sticker. A 2018 study by researchers, found that adding just a few strategically placed stickers on traffic signs could trick a deep learning model into misclassifying the sign with a staggering 84% success rate*. The consequences of such an attack could be catastrophic. But how exactly do these attacks work?

Adversarial attacks come in many forms, all aiming to manipulate an AI model’s decision-making processes. Here are some common techniques that attackers use to exploit models:

Adding imperceptible noise:

Imagine adding minuscule changes to an image, invisible to the human eye, that completely alter how an AI classifies it. For instance, adding specific noise to a picture of a cat might trick a facial recognition system into identifying it as a dog.

Crafting adversarial inputs: 

Attackers can create entirely new data points that an AI model has never seen before. These examples are specifically designed to exploit the model’s weaknesses and force it to make a wrong prediction.

Poisoning:

In some cases, attackers might try to manipulate the training data itself. By injecting perturbations into the data used to train an AI model, they can influence the model’s behavior from the ground up.

Extraction:

Attackers can try to steal or replicate the underlying model by querying it extensively and analyzing the responses. This attack tries to reverse-engineer the AI model, effectively “stealing” its intellectual property, leading to intellectual property theft.

Inference:

In some cases, attackers try to extract sensitive information from the model’s output. They try to analyze the model’s response to various inputs; attackers can infer confidential data, such as personal user information or proprietary data used in the training model.

The susceptibility of AI models to adversarial attacks varies depending on their architecture. Even models with millions of parameters can be fooled with cleverly crafted attacks.


Mitigating attacks with Styrk

Enterprise usage of AI is increasingly threatened by adversarial attacks, where AI models are deceived using manipulated data. To address this, Styrk offers its AI security product, Armor,  which assesses and enhances the robustness of AI models. Armor scans labeled data and performs pre-selected adversarial attacks on it. After executing these attacks, the system identifies any vulnerabilities and reports them to the customer in a comprehensive report format. 

In addition to identifying adversarial attacks, Styrk’s Armor also proposes defense mechanisms against adversarial attacks. As attacks continue to increase and evolve constantly, Armor keeps adding new attacks and defenses to its systems, keeping ahead of the curve in developing robust solutions that customers can use to keep their AI models safe and performant. At Styrk, we provide solutions that can help identify such attacks and propose mitigation mechanisms to ensure that AI technology helps, not hinders, enterprises. 


Contact us to understand how Armor can help safeguard your AI model from adversarial attacks. 

*https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content_cvpr_2018/papers/Eykholt_Robust_Physical-World_Attacks_CVPR_2018_paper.pdf

Making LLMs Secure and Private

Between 2022 and now, the generative AI market value has increased from $29 billion to $50 billion–representing an increase of 54.7% over two years. The market valuation is expected to rise to $66.62 billion by the end of 2024* and  suggests  a surge in companies seeking to integrate generative AI into their operations, often through tools like ChatGPT, Llama, and Gemini, to enhance and automate customer interactions.

While AI technology promises significant benefits for businesses, the growing adoption of generative AI tools comes with the risk of exposing users’ sensitive data to LLM models. Ensuring the privacy and security of users’ sensitive data remains a top priority for enterprises, especially in light of stringent regulatory requirements like the EU AI Act to protect personal and financial data of its users.

To keep enterprise data secure while using the generative AI tools, Styrk offers multiple privacy-preserving mechanisms and a security wrapper that enables businesses to harness the power of generative AI models. This safeguards sensitive information and maintains compliance with data protection regulations.

Styrk’s core capabilities for LLM security

Not only can Styrk be used to protect sensitive data but it can also help safeguard AI models from prompt injection attacks or filtering out gibberish text. Some of Styrk’s  key capabilities include:   

Compliance monitoring:

Styrk provides a compliance and reporting dashboard that enables organizations to track the flow of sensitive information through AI systems. Data visualization makes it easier to identify data breaches, adhere to regulatory standards, and, ultimately, mitigate risk. 

Blocks prompt injections: 

Styrk’s Portal is equipped with mechanisms to filter prompt injections, safeguarding AI systems from malicious attacks or manipulation attempts. By mitigating the risk of prompt-injection vulnerabilities, Portal enhances the security and resilience of AI-powered interactions, ensuring a safe and trustworthy user experience.

Data privacy and protection: 

Companies across various sectors can use Styrk’s Portal to protect sensitive customer information before it is processed by AI models. For example, Styrk deidentifies personally identifiable information (PII) such as names, addresses, and account details to prevent privacy risks.

Gibberish text detection:

Styrk’s Portal filters out gibberish text, ensuring that only coherent and relevant input is processed by AI models. Detecting gibberish text also helps in preventing any potential jailbreak or prompt injection attacks. This enhances the quality and reliability of AI-generated outputs, leading to more accurate and meaningful interactions.

The AI industry is rapidly growing and is already helping companies deliver more personalized and efficient customer experiences. Yet as businesses adopt generative AI into their operations, they must prioritize protecting their enterprise data, including sensitive customer data. Not only does Styrk enhance customer engagement, it enables regulatory compliance in a fast-moving landscape. Styrk prepares businesses to anticipate changes in AI and adjust their strategies and models accordingly. Contact us today to learn more on how Portal can help your business. 

*Generative artificial intelligence (AI) market size worldwide from 2020 to 2030